The phrase evokes the unintended and damaging penalties of actions that originally appeared constructive or well-intentioned. It implies that insurance policies or choices, when applied, yield outcomes which might be dangerous or detrimental, opposite to the unique goal. For instance, a strict regulation supposed to cut back crime might inadvertently result in elevated mistrust of regulation enforcement inside sure communities, creating an atmosphere the place prison exercise is harder to handle.
The importance of understanding this idea lies in its means to focus on the complexities inherent in authorized and social reforms. Recognizing the potential for unexpected damaging outcomes permits for a extra nuanced and cautious strategy to policymaking. Traditionally, cases the place well-meaning interventions have produced hostile results underscore the significance of complete evaluation and cautious consideration of potential repercussions earlier than implementing important modifications. This consciousness facilitates proactive mitigation methods.
